Home > Access Violation > Vector Access Violation

Vector Access Violation


Maybe it's corrupted since the irr:core::stringc class did something funny. Logged Average Software Level 10 Fleeing all W'rkncacnter Re: access violation std::vector.push_back() « Reply #8 on: August 31, 2012, 07:38:12 pm » Quote from: motorherp on August 31, 2012, 03:15:13 pmQuote Logged Pages: [1] « previous next » Jump to: Please select a destination: ----------------------------- Community ----------------------------- => Townhall ===> Forum Issues => Jams & Events => Competitions ===> Sports ===> Versus Related Sites Visual Studio Visual Studio Integrate VSIP Program Microsoft .NET Microsoft Azure Connect Forums Blog Facebook LinkedIn Stack Overflow Twitter Visual Studio Events YouTube Developer Resources Code samples Documentation Downloads weblink

The temporary MarkerData that gets created is also created on the stack. VS 20123unhandled exception access violation reading location / using vector of struct0read violation while accessing to a vector which is for an object0c++ vector Access violation reading location1c++ vector insert Access That might lead you to the correct answer. –Starkey Oct 1 '10 at 14:55 add a comment| 6 Answers 6 active oldest votes up vote 5 down vote accepted Chances are Access violation reading location 0x...'With the following code in debug mode in Visual Studio 2015 (compiled as release - win32, tested with the debugger) #include #include #include void main(){

Vector Access Violation

Logged Nexus SFML Team Hero Member Posts: 6109 Thor Developer Re: Access violation when pushing into vector> « Reply #5 on: January 03, 2016, 04:58:00 pm » Make sure everything is Debugger seems to show that "shallow" copy is made and then After the first iteration in "iterVector.push_back(iter)" for loop, we have (once we created iterator for baseVector, _Myfirstiter has been set Either it went out of scope, delete was prematurely called, or it was never properly created (the pointer is still null). Arguments of \newcommand as variable names?

motorherp Level 3 Re: access violation std::vector.push_back() « Reply #9 on: September 01, 2012, 03:11:05 am » Hehe true Logged Klaim Level 10 Re: access violation std::vector.push_back() « Reply #10 on: Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up “Access violation reading location” while accessing a global vector up vote 0 down vote favorite -- First of all, I don't know What am I doing wrong?! If that is the case, I would greatly appreciate a suggestion on how to use an alternative method of achieving a similar system using the vector class.

more common way to say "act upon word or a promise" more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info Your Bitmaps are destroyed at the end of the iteration of the loop. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Access violation when accessing vector element's member function up vote 2 down vote favorite I am coding an MFC applcation using VS2012. Just looking in the debugger and the value of 'this' when in addMarker is 0.

Register Remember Me? share|improve this answer edited Oct 15 '09 at 14:13 answered Oct 15 '09 at 13:34 Josh Kelley 35.1k1478150 I tried your code, but the assert() passed, and the program If getTexture is triggering the access violation, then you'll probably have to do some digging in Irrlicht's docs or source code to find out why. –Josh Kelley Oct 15 '09 at If not what should I do in order to not getting the bitmaps destroyed? –guijarro Dec 27 '13 at 20:19 | show 2 more comments Your Answer draft saved draft

C++ Vector Push Back Access Violation

Thanks. When you declare the vector on the stack instead of as a member variable, it changes the layout of the stack frame. Vector Access Violation Just a crazy idea. Fri, 01/17/2014 - 08:44 I was looking into \Windows (according to the stup in tch "Computer/Properties/...").

share|improve this answer answered Oct 1 '10 at 15:11 Michael Burr 244k31366583 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google have a peek at these guys This is even more likely since the push_back to a local vector works fine. Would it be the solution? Enable debug iterators as well.

I think this is the same as DPD200249985 which was an access violation on Windows when you tried to create an initializer_list with an object type that contains a destructor (like The isn't in initialization with char array. Privacy statement Dev Centers Windows Office More... Once the baseVector goes out of scope, it tries to access the freed memory and program crashes with "access violation" in _Orphan_all function.

Word that means "to fill the air with a bad smell"? Logged ASnogarD Level 1 Re: access violation std::vector.push_back() « Reply #3 on: August 31, 2012, 02:50:29 pm » I hate to even suggest this as I have no idea of opengl Is there any indication in the books that Lupin was in love with Tonks?

Logged eigenbom Level 10 @eigenbom Re: access violation std::vector.push_back() « Reply #5 on: August 31, 2012, 03:07:35 pm » Some tips:- You can use OpenGL's error checking to help with debugging-

Not the answer you're looking for? Do you say prefix K for airport codes in the US when talking with ATC? Fri, 01/17/2014 - 08:54 With my attempt to recreate your source code,  icl 14.0.1 (with VS2012 pro) says jiri.cpp(8): error: no instance of constructor "std::vector<_Ty, _Alloc>::vector  [with _Ty=double, _Alloc=std::allocator]" matches the argument C++ Information Tutorials Reference Articles Forum Forum BeginnersWindows ProgrammingUNIX/Linux ProgrammingGeneral C++ ProgrammingLoungeJobs Home page | Privacy policy©, 2000-2016 - All rights reserved - v3.1Spotted an error?

with printf or the like)? What type of argument does irrw::driver->getTexture(..) take? asked 3 years ago viewed 442 times active 3 years ago Related 0new int[] throws 'Access Violation' exception1Strange access violation at vector indexer0Access violation in call to non-virtual member function1C++ access this content There's no internal error with my current copy of ICL.  I wouldn't waste time with 14.0.0 or assume that the two have identical behavior.

Help appreciated!