Home > Failed To > Failed To Load Module Fglrx Ubuntu

Failed To Load Module Fglrx Ubuntu

Are you new to Precise 12.04 Review | Things to do after Installing 12.04 | Troubleshoot & Customize Unity | Android Blog - Cell Rabta Adv Reply October 21st, 2010 #10 fredrikj View Profile Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ I think this might be some kind of dkms problem.

Report a bug This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. is driver == module?)... pleasepleasedme Slackware 3 04-02-2013 03:11 PM Amd/Ati proprietary driver mesa 9 xorg 1.13 issue Amrod78 Slackware 6 02-26-2013 01:11 PM All times are GMT -5. They just aren't there.

I tried Code: sudo Xorg --configure (which I believe sets a configuration based on the detected hardware?) Yes for sure something is broken. OpenGL renderer string: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series OpenGL version string: 4.3.12618 Compatibility Profile Context 13.251 btw before 'Compatibility Profile Context 9.012' but I also tried to reinstall from ATI > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop [SOLVED] broke Xorg when trying to install proprietary AMD driver User Name Remember Me?

The driver comes from AMD's homepage I followed mostlyharmless' link, this allowed me to remove the ati proprietary stuff, there's a script /usr/share/ati/ that does this the output, for the Subscribing... For details and our forum data attribution, retention and privacy policy, see here Arch Linux HomePackagesForumsWikiBugsAURDownload Index Rules Search Register Login You are not logged in. Clone yourself!

And things like xcalib instead of amdcccle to adjust settings. 1 members found this post helpful. Graphics card: ATI Technologies Inc RS880 [Radeon HD 4200] I have successfully install fglrx and other related packages. Tried the instructions in comment #18 but did not change anything. And mark it as duplicate of this.

If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. [ 55.440] (II) Loader magic: 0x80bc40 [ 55.440] (II) Module ABI versions: [ 55.440] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [ 55.440] Like r200, r300, ... Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. If I run "startx", I get: ...

I theorize it was probably something to do with me incorrectly copying xorg modules and had nothing to do with me adding LoadExtension back into xorg, but I turned my changes I can't find any website which reunites all those info. For legacy cards you have to run kernels at or older than 3.4.x to use the fglrx driver. dpkg -l | grep fglrx sudo apt-get purge cd /path/to/generated/fglrx*.deb sudo dpkg -i fglrx*.deb This "solution" requires you to repeat it every time you install a

If I boot with the old 3.8 kernel everything is hunkey-dorey. his comment is here Primary monitor has very low resolution. See full activity log To post a comment you must log in. radeon still in use.

What X -configure does is create/generate a file in the root user directory, it can't be run while X and login manager are running. Quote: Originally Posted by pedru Another question: as user, am I supposed to edit the xorg config file? I tried Code: sudo Xorg --configure (which I believe sets a configuration based on the detected hardware?) but it fails, the log file says: Code: [ 118.325] X.Org X Server 1.14.4 It's quite well defined now.

Adv Reply October 21st, 2010 #3 sikander3786 View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Visit Homepage Simply, Ubuntu Addict! Crossreferencing verbatim List all multiplicative partitions of n Pseudo-currying in one line Why does rotation occur? I would like to restore the open source driver rather than install the proprietary one (I don't even know if I really need the proprietary one).

Thanks for all the suggestions!

UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. If I use "Hardware Drivers" utility, I see the "ATI Fire GL" as activated, deactivating and activating again didn't help. Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

Thanks everybody for your help, Cheers! Usualy those drivers cover a range of devices. Ubuntu Ubuntu Insights Planet Ubuntu Activity Page Please read before SSO login Advanced Search Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Installation & Upgrades [SOLVED] Cannot reach desktop ("Failed navigate here apt-get install --reinstall fglrx ...

Offline #8 2014-07-30 23:18:16 electrojustin Member Registered: 2014-04-12 Posts: 8 Re: [Solved] Xorg fglrx module not properly loading Oh was I supposed to use that method? Reason: clarification pedru View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by pedru 01-22-2014, 04:41 PM #7 ukiuki Senior Member Registered: Ask Ubuntu works best with JavaScript enabled FAQ Forum Quick Links Unanswered Posts New Posts View Forum Leaders FAQ Contact an Admin Forum Community Forum Council FC Agenda Forum Governance Forum Any suggestions?FINAL UPDATE: After running out of ideas on how to get the mouse working, I just gave up and tried downgrading xorg and installing catalyst from the repos, like everyone

dmi.bios.version: A07 0D6H9T dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest Offline #3 2014-07-30 22:46:01 electrojustin Member Registered: 2014-04-12 Posts: 8 Re: [Solved] Xorg fglrx module not properly loading It's Catalyst (proprietary ATI driver), so I think you have to wait until Join Date Apr 2009 Location Rawalpindi, Pakistan Beans 5,666 DistroUbuntu Gnome Development Release Re: Cannot reach desktop ("Failed to load module "fglrx") after upgrading If you don't see the Grub menu

What I can try more for solve this bug? Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Search this Thread 01-18-2014, 08:30 AM #1 pedru LQ Newbie Registered: Jan 2014 Location: Lausanne, Switzerland Distribution: LMDE, Fedora Posts: 6 But you can start X as a user. I have another problem now, when I plug in my second monitor on the HDMI port (the first is DVI), the image is just mirrored.

I loaded recovery and did sudo apt-get update, upgrade After that system loaded normally, and fglrx driver was installed successfully Otus (jan-varho) wrote on 2015-11-18: #20 gpu-manager.log Edit (2.0 KiB, text/plain) Report a bug This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. Quote: Originally Posted by pedru I think I screwed up /etc/X11/xorg.conf somehow? Yes.

Basically you may need to "re-install" the xorg server to restore the original files and configurations. On startx it displays Failed to load module fglrx (module does not exist 0) No drivers available ddxsiggiveup :closing log giving up xinit: No such file or directory (errno 2).unable to Device 200a Kernel driver in use: radeon $ uname -a Linux andrew-pc 3.13.0-29-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 4 21:00:20 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux update-alternatives --display x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf - Alberto pedru View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by pedru 02-02-2014, 12:12 PM #10 Shadowmeph Member Registered: May 2008 Location: West

The X specific files I mention are in /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ and end in I just went into /var/cache/pacman/pkg and started installing a whole bunch of outdated things that seemed Xorg related.Edit 1: Yes, I have tried the open source driver, but unfortunately it does I understand that the following steps are quite distro-dependent (Fedora 20 here).