gbnetvideo.net

Home > Failed To > Failed To Start Lsb Nfs Support Files Common To Client And Server

Failed To Start Lsb Nfs Support Files Common To Client And Server

Contents

share|improve this answer answered Sep 19 '11 at 9:04 Selivanov Pavel 1,0651227 I tried set -x but that didn't do anything. man find gives you the explanation for the find command. –reinierpost Sep 20 '11 at 10:51 I tried to delete my previous comment as I had resolved the issue. chown /var/lib/nfs to choose different user Feb 12 00:02:19 martin-xps.lico.nl rpc.statd[23584]: failed to create RPC listeners, exiting I tried to chown /var/lib/nfs to rpc, which just gives me the error minus Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] [signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)] Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian kernel team : Bug#740491; Package nfs-common. (Sat, 31 May 2014 15:39:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. http://gbnetvideo.net/failed-to/synergy-failed-to-connect-to-server-server-refused-client-with-our-name.html

Cheers! Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Could you make me a hexagon please? Francesco Poli . http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=107216

Failed To Start Lsb Nfs Support Files Common To Client And Server

Copy sent to Debian kernel team . (Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Now, whenever I start up the machine, it comes up with these failure messages: "Starting NFS Common Utilities: statd failed!" "startpar: service(s) returned failure: nfs-common ... That's an unrelated issue. debian virtual-machines nfs portmap share|improve this question asked Sep 19 '11 at 8:19 Miss M 76210 add a comment| 2 Answers 2 active oldest votes up vote 1 down vote accepted

Could you maybe tell me how I can sift through all the log files and see only the config files? In how many bits do I fit Why didn't the Roman maniple make a comeback in the Renaissance? David the H. Message #5 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Julien Cristau To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: nfs-common: fails to upgrade (action "restart" failed) Date: Sun, 2 Mar

Contact Us Advertising Positioningby Digital Point Terms and Rules Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2015 XenForo Ltd. Main: Open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No Such File Or Directory For the newly copied virtual machine, I changed the IP address, hostname and MAC address. Bash Guru Registered: Jun 2004 Location: Osaka, Japan Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4 Posts: 6,823 Rep: rpc.statd not running I ran a large system update yesterday, and Unix & Linux Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled current community chat Unix & Linux Unix & Linux Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list.

Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb [Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)] Information forwarded to Startup message: [FAIL] Starting NFS common utilities: statd idmapd failed! Message #10 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Vincent van Leeuwen To: [email protected] Subject: Re: nfs-common: fails to upgrade (action "restart" failed) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:25:33

Main: Open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No Such File Or Directory

Toggle useless messagesView this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox Report forwarded to [email protected], Debian kernel team : Bug#740491; Package nfs-common. (Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:33:06 GMT) Full http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/184338/nfs-no-longer-mounts-rpc-statd-fails-to-start The time now is 11:14 PM. Failed To Start Lsb Nfs Support Files Common To Client And Server Downgrading from libtirpc1 0.2.2-5.1 to libtirpc1 to 0.2.2-5 did bring NFS back up after restart of rpcbind, nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server. dpkg: error processing nfs-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: nfs-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) /var/log/syslog has following

Information forwarded to [email protected], Debian kernel team : Bug#740491; Package nfs-common. (Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. his comment is here It's not very high on my TODO list to write a package-specific NEWS file that explains to users something that follows obviously from how conffiles work. rpc.statd[10105]: Failed to read /var/lib/nfs/state: Success rpc.statd[10105]: Initializing NSM state rpc.statd[10105]: failed to create RPC listeners, exiting ----------------------------------------------------------------- Tried restarting nfslock but to no avail, then tried with vers=3 option but If no, then all messages are logged to syslog, which by default in Debian and Ubuntu resides in /var/log/syslog.

Ed Morbius" Re: Starting NFS common utilities failed! After this operation, 718 kB of additional disk space will be used. linux arch-linux nfs share|improve this question asked Feb 11 '15 at 23:11 Carpetsmoker 7921521 add a comment| 3 Answers 3 active oldest votes up vote 15 down vote same problem here, http://gbnetvideo.net/failed-to/failed-to-connect-to-server-incompatible-client-1-3.html I just experienced exactly the same problem (couldn't mount an NFS3 volume, systemctl start rpc-statd failed with "failed to create RPC listeners, exiting" message.) on an Arch linux system.

Unix & Linux Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search Acknowledgement sent to Robin Wood : Extra info received and forwarded to list. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest.

Routing, network cards, OSI, etc.

Message #30 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Robin Wood To: [email protected] Subject: same problem, different solution Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:54:32 +0000 The two previous suggestions Added tag(s) sid and jessie. Try "mkdir -p /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs" then restarting portmap (or rpcbind), and any/all nfs-* and rpc.* init.d entries. syslog, dmesg?

Feb 12 00:05:09 martin-xps.lico.nl systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service failed. David the H. Aurelien Jarno (supplier of updated libtirpc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators navigate here First guess: you still have the old hostname floating around in a couple of configuration files.

Perhaps a FS corruption issue (?) The strange thing is that nfsd was still running, but statd wasn't. Feb 12 00:05:09 martin-xps.lico.nl systemd[1]: Unit rpc-statd.service entered failed state. dpkg: error processing package nfs-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 [...] Errors were encountered while processing: nfs-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) $ Marked as fixed in versions 0.2.3-2.

Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/nfs-common ... The 'status' RPC service stay in the list even after rpc.statd is stopped. Yes, logs are usually in /var/log so you may want to replace /var with something more specific. Bug archived.

My syslog showed similar information to that quoted above: Mar 2 04:03:06 localhost rpc.statd[14412]: Version 1.2.8 starting Mar 2 04:03:06 localhost sm-notify[14413]: Version 1.2.8 starting Mar 2 04:03:06 localhost sm-notify[14413]: Already failed!" I know this is a rather common issue but I haven't yet found any answers to the problem. I have no idea why rpc.statd failed to tell rpcbind that its service was no longer active, and no idea how the changes in libtirpc since 0.2.2-5 could cause this. -- Message #45 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Mike Gabriel To: [email protected] Subject: Please provide a NEWS file that informs about necessary changes to idmapd.conf Date: Fri, 11